WebAug 6, 2014 · State of Maharashtra Vs. Somnath Thapa (1996-4-SCC-659) In response, Mr.A.Ramesh, the learned senior counsel for the Respondents/A1 and A2 argued on the authority of decisions of the Honourable Supreme Court in:- i. Preeti Gupta and another Vs. State of Jharkhand and another (2010-7-SCC-667). ii. Union of India Vs. http://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/smt-vimal-thapa-wo-late-somnath-kakaram-thapa-a-112-vs-the-state-of-maharashtra

State of Tamil Nadu Through Superintendent of Police, Cbi/S Vs.

WebFeb 12, 2014 · Which was quoted with approval in paragraph 76 of State of west Bengal vs. Mohd. Khalid, 1995 (1)SCC 684 is that what the Court has to see, while considering the question of framing the charge, is whether the material brought on record would reasonably connect the accused with the crime. No more is required to be inquired into. 30. WebState of Maharashtra vs Somnath Thapa , AIR 1996 SC 1744 In this case Supreme Court held that to establish a charge of conspiracy the knowledge about the indulgence in either … tamu holiday schedule 2021

State of Maharashtra Vs. Som Nath Thapa, [1996] INSC 526 (12 …

http://courtverdict.com/supreme-court-of-india/smt-vimal-thapa-wo-late-somnath-kakaram-thapa-a-112-vs-the-state-of-maharashtra WebJun 14, 2016 · Respondent no.1 is the State of Maharashtra represented through the Secretary, Industries, Energy and Labour Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai. Respondent … WebIn State of Maharashtra & Ors. vs. Somnath Thapa & Ors. [(1996) 4 SCC 659], Hansaria,J., speaking for a three-Judge Bench of this Court after elaborate discussions of the various judgments of this Court, concluded thus : To establish a charge of conspiracy knowledge about indulgence in either an illegal act or a legal act by illegal means is ... tamu hockey team