WebFrom what I've read, about the physics, iRacing simulates 4 contact patches vs 1 big contact patch on the console "sims". Also, iRacing doesn't add extra force feedback effects, so it will feel "watered down" compared to AC and ACC, where the devs have added a lot of road feel and slip feel, that really isn't there, but gives more life to the FFB. WebMar 14, 2024 · I have experience with iRacnig and Project Cars 2 so I can write objective opinion. As many said above iRacing is focused on online racing, it has very good car …
Is Project Cars 2 Still Worth It in 2024? - YouTube
WebProject cars=more fun assetto=more realistic TheREALbread • not really accurate. Both have interesting aspects to them. FFB in AC is imo better than pcars. Track and car selection in pcars is better, but AC supports mods more so than pcars and that provides for lots of potential car/track combos. WebJan 1, 2024 · VR Direct Comparison rFactor 2 VS iRacing VS Project CARS 2 - YouTube 0:00 / 3:24 VR Direct Comparison rFactor 2 VS iRacing VS Project CARS 2 Marcus Krüger 24 subscribers Subscribe 3.7K... raymond goldesberry
iRacing Vs rFactor 2: Which is Better in 2024? - Solox
WebIn terms of cars and tracks selection, Project Cars 2 has the edge over Raceroom. It features a total of 190 cars and 60+ tracks, while Raceroom has a bit less with a total of 180+ cars and 50+ tracks. It’s important to note that some of the tracks in Project Cars 2 are DLC, while most of the tracks in Raceroom are included in the game. WebFeb 18, 2024 · for me its project cars 2 is the favourit because of the rally cross there inst much content but its fun all the same. like kobold says its mainly down to VR or not. asseto seems to run better than project cars in VR for me so if you have any plans to upgrade your rig and use VR then asseto would be the first choice. alot of people have project cars … WebConsidering the car uses ~3L per lap, and VRS and IMSA limit the amount of fuel you can hold/refuel I suppose that makes sense. I was expecting the engine map setting to be way more aggressive than it is. The .06L estimate is based on 3 instead of 4 … simplicity\\u0027s bu