14) The parties agree that this case turns on the question of whether or not X’s new accommodation meets the statutory definition of “supported living” or not. If it does, then it is specified accommodation to which the deeming provision in section 39 of the Care Act 2014 applies and X will be deemed ordinarily … See more 4) X has a diagnosis of cerebral palsy which he has had since birth. As a result of this condition, X is a full time wheelchair user. X has no active movement in his lower limbs and has … See more 34) The parties correctly identify that the issue in this case is whether X’s new accommodation meets the statutory definition of “supported living” or not. 35) I agree with Council … See more 24) I have considered all the documents submitted by the 3 authorities, the provisions of Part 1 of the 2014 Act and the Regulations made under it, the guidance on ordinary residence issued by the Department, and … See more WebFeb 17, 2024 · The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care has successfully defended his determination in an ‘ordinary residence’ dispute between two councils over the …
Ordinary Residence
WebA child looked after overseas – 'habitual' or 'ordinary' residence 20. It is therefore necessary to consider whether it is possible for IA to remain habitually resident here notwithstanding that pursuant to the local authority's plan … WebCouncilA relies on the case of R(Greenwich) v Secretary of State and Bexley ([2006] EWHC 2576 (Admin) (“Greenwich”) in order to submit that X’s ordinary residence is to be determined at the date immediately before accommodation was provided by a local authority and not on the date immediately before he became a self funder. In his case this porto cristo dialysis ehic
DETERMINATION BY THE SECRETARY OF STATE UNDER …
WebDocuments must be current and include resident's name and Greenwich address. Utility bill (gas, electric, oil, water) Cable, telephone, internet, cell phone Residential lease (12 … WebFeb 3, 2024 · The Court of Appeal held that: (1) Area 1’s duty subsists until it comes to an end by a s117 (2) decision that the patient “is no longer in need” of aftercare services (ordinary residence in area 2 when subsequently detained makes no difference); there had been no such decision so the duty continued throughout both the second period of … Web‘Who Pays’ Guidance and Appendix 5, case study 7. Annex B of ‘Who pays’ guidance 2013 defines ordinary residence and provides a useful distinction of the changing commissioner responsibilities for patients discharged under s117. Patients discharged pre 1 April 2013 come under the pre August 2013 PCT Who porto cristo town