WebJan 1, 2011 · Dezember 2010 in der Sache Peter Pammer gegen Reederei Karl Schlüter GmbH & Co. KG und Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH gegen Oliver Heller January 2011 DOI: 10.5167/uzh-48516 WebPammer v Reederei Karl Schlüter; Hotel Alpenhof v Oliver Heller. ECJ Cases C-585/08 & C-144/09 9th October 2011 by admin. Open the Article. This judgment discusses two …
CURIA - List of results
WebJun 1, 2011 · This article has described and analyzed the ECJ’s recent judgement in the joined cases of Pammer and Hotel Alpenhof. That judgement will have an important long-term impact on cross-border e-commerce within the European Union. Regrettably, the ECJ’s judgement provides limited practical guidance apart from the, arguably unfortunate ... WebFeb 8, 2015 · 32 Insoweit ergibt sich aus der Rechtsprechung des Gerichtshofs, dass Art. 5 Nr. 3 der Verordnung Nr. 44/2001 im Gegensatz zu Art. 15 Abs. 1 Buchst. c dieser Verordnung, der in dem Urteil Pammer und Hotel Alpenhof (C‑585/08 und C‑144/09, EU:C:2010:740), ausgelegt wurde, nicht verlangt, dass die fragliche Website auf den … mymichigan health freeland
Pammer v. Karl Schlütter GmbH & Co and Hotel Alpenhof v. Mr.
WebSep 9, 2024 · I do not rule out a line of reasoning which takes the judgment in Pammer and Alpenhof as a starting point and then, as a second step, focuses on establishing whether there are grounds for distinguishing between the activity which the professional pursues in a State and the activity which it directs to that State, in the context of Article 15(1 ... WebDec 7, 2010 · December 07, 2010. In this case, the CJEU applied the internal EU Brussels I regulation to assess the relative jurisdiction and authority of EU Member State courts in two cases involving contracts for online travel booking. The CJEU defined a targeting-based test for jurisdiction over Internet entities in this situation, and said that mere ... Webdes Urteils Pammer und Hotel Alpenhof zum Vorbringen der Hotel Alpenhof GesmbH, Art 15 Abs 1 lit c der Bru¨s-sel-I-VO sei nicht anwendbar, weil der Vertrag mit dem ... EuGH 6. 9. 2012, Rs C-544/10 (Deutsches Weintor eG/Land Rheinland-Pfalz; Bundesverwaltungsgericht [Deutschland]) mymichigan health network - midland